I received this joke from the publisher of Way Cool Dogs, a nice site that deals with a variety of dog issues, including some fun stuff.  Since everyone had to go back to work today and would probably prefer to still be on vacation I thought something to give you a laugh was in order.

Here it is…Intelligence Of A Government Dog Employee.

Four men were bragging about how smart their dogs were.
The first man was an Engineer.
The second man was an Accountant.
The third man was a Chemist.
The fourth man was a Government Employee.

To show off, the Engineer called his dog “T-square” over to do her stuff.
The dog pranced over to the desk, took out some paper and pen, then promptly drew a circle, a square and a triangle.

Everybody agreed that was pretty smart.

But the Accountant said his dog could do better. He called his dog, “Spreadsheet” over and told her to do her stuff. The dog went out to the kitchen and returned with a dozen cookies. She then divided them into four equal piles of 3 cookies each.

Everybody agreed that was pretty good.

But the Chemist said his dog could do better. He called his dog “Measure” and told her to do her stuff.
The dog got up, walked over to the refrigerator and got out a quart of milk. She then took a 10-ounce glass from the cupboard and poured exactly 8-ounces of milk into the glass without spilling a drop.

Everybody agreed that was pretty good.

Then the three men turned to the Government Employee and said, “What can your dog do?”
The Government Employee called his dog and said, “Coffeebreak….do your stuff!”
Coffeebreak jumped to his feet.

He ate the cookies.
He drank the milk
He pooped on the paper…
and them claimed he injured his back while doing so.
He then filed a grievance report for unsafe working conditions….
then put in for Workers Compensation and then went home for the rest of the day on sick leave.

Which is why every dog wants to work for the Government!

(Thanks to Val Reed of Wilcox NE for submitting for this dog revisal!)

Share this entry with your pawple anywhere: